Getting the Residential Status Wrong Costs More Than the Tax Itself

Every tax season, a familiar pattern shows up among NRIs filing their Indian returns: the number on the tax software looks fine, but the residential status entered at the top of the form is wrong. That single field decides whether global income gets taxed in India or just the India-sourced portion. Get it wrong and every other number downstream is built on a shaky foundation, refund included.

Residential status under Indian tax law isn’t about passport or visa category. It hinges on the number of days spent in India during the financial year and the preceding years, with separate thresholds for Indian citizens and persons of Indian origin who visit from abroad. Someone who spent an unusually long stretch in India during a particular year, for a parent’s illness or a sabbatical, can unknowingly cross into resident status and find their foreign salary or rental income suddenly reportable.

Capital gains are the other place things get messy. Shares, mutual funds, and property each carry different holding periods for what counts as long-term, and different tax treatment follows. NRIs selling Indian property often face TDS deducted at a rate meant for non-residents, which is usually higher than their actual tax liability, recoverable only by filing a return and claiming the refund.

Foreign assets and income, where applicable, need to be disclosed in the relevant schedule, and this obligation catches even those who assume a small overseas account doesn’t count. The reporting bar is about ownership and existence, not about how much tax is ultimately owed on it. Advisors at Ashutosh Financial Services see this misconception surface almost every year.

For anyone claiming tax credit for taxes already paid abroad under a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, the supporting form has to be filed before the return, not alongside it. Miss that sequence and the credit gets denied regardless of how legitimate the claim is. Ashutosh Financial Services has flagged this timing issue as one of the more avoidable filing errors among NRI clients.

None of this is about finding loopholes. It’s about filing an accurate return the first time, since revised filings invite more scrutiny, not less. Ashutosh Financial Services continues to run seasonal tax-awareness sessions aimed at helping filers get these details right before the deadline pressure sets in.

🎥 Watch the full video:

The same rupee of income can face a different tax outcome depending entirely on which entity earns it, an individual, a Hindu Undivided Family, a partnership firm, or a company. This isn’t a loophole. It’s how the Income Tax Act is structured, and understanding the differences is useful well beyond just filing an accurate return.

Individuals are taxed on a slab basis, with rates increasing as income rises, and have access to the full range of deductions and exemptions available under the old and new tax regimes. This is the framework most people are familiar with, since it’s the one salaried professionals deal with directly.

Companies, by contrast, are taxed at a flat rate regardless of income level, with the specific rate depending on turnover and whether certain concessional regimes have been opted into. There’s no slab structure and no personal deductions, since a company is a separate legal entity with its own tax identity distinct from its shareholders or directors.

Partnership firms and LLPs sit in their own category, generally taxed at a flat rate on the firm’s income, with partners then not taxed again on their share of profits already taxed at the firm level, since double taxation on the same income is specifically avoided under the relevant provisions.

A Hindu Undivided Family is taxed as a separate entity too, with its own PAN and its own slab-based taxation, functioning almost like an additional individual taxpayer within a family structure. Advisors at Ashutosh Financial Services often see this used, appropriately, as a legitimate tool for spreading income across entities within a family rather than concentrating everything under one individual’s slab.

None of these structures are interchangeable, and choosing one purely for a tax outcome without considering the legal and operational implications tends to create more complexity than it saves. Ashutosh Financial Services continues to help individuals and families think through entity structuring as part of its broader tax planning conversations.